🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.